Modvat credit limited to duty actually paid on inputs; excess credit is inadmissible where exemption reduces payable duty.

Modvat credit on L. naphthylamine was considered in light of the exemption structure and the extent of duty actually payable on the input used in manufacture. The article states that credit is available only to the extent duty was actually paid and legally available as credit; where the applicable exemption or tariff linkage reduces the duty payable, any excess claimed beyond that amount is inadmissible. The discussion follows an earlier Tribunal view on the same point and applies it to conclude that broader credit could not be taken on the facts described.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the input L. naphthylamine in the facts of the case, having regard to the relevant exemption notifications and the extent to which duty had been paid on the input used in manufacture.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of the exemption structure and the availability of credit only to the extent of duty actually payable and paid on the input. The prior Tribunal ruling relied upon held that where the duty payable on the final product, after applying the exemption notification, is less than the duty on the input used in manufacture, credit is admissible only to that limited extent and any excess credit is not credit of duty paid. The matter was therefore governed by the earlier view already taken on the same point.

Conclusion: Modvat credit beyond the amount corresponding to duty actually payable on the input was inadmissible, and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the broader credit claimed, and the departmental challenge succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Where exemption or tariff linkage limits the duty payable on the relevant input, Modvat credit can be taken only to the extent of duty actually paid and legally available as credit; any excess is inadmissible.

---