Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether serial No. 10 of Notification No. 52/86-C.E. dated 10-2-1986 covered non-woven glass fabrics and entitled the assessee to exemption.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the question stood covered by its earlier decision in the assessee's own case, where it was held that serial No. 10 of the notification did not distinguish between woven and non-woven fabrics. On that basis, the exemption was held to apply equally to non-woven fabrics. The contrary view in the impugned order was therefore not sustainable.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. Non-woven glass fabrics were held eligible for the benefit of serial No. 10 of Notification No. 52/86-C.E. dated 10-2-1986.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, with consequential relief subject to the law of unjust enrichment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption entry does not distinguish between woven and non-woven fabrics, the benefit of the notification extends to both.