Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether barges manufactured by the assessee were covered by the expression "Ocean Going Vessels" and therefore exempt from excise duty under the relevant exemption notifications.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of the exemption granted to "Ocean Going Vessels" under Notification No. 102/80, which amended Notification No. 55/75, and later Notification No. 104/82, which continued the same exemption. The Tribunal noted that an earlier decision in the assessee's own case had already treated such barges as falling within that expression. The later Supreme Court decision relied upon by the department was held to be on a different controversy and not concerned with the phrase "Ocean Going Vessels" as used in these notifications.
Conclusion: The barges were held to be covered by the exemption as "Ocean Going Vessels", and the appeal was rejected.