Classification dispute over goods from a 100% EOU remanded for fresh fact-finding on their actual nature and duty consequences.

Classification of goods cleared from a 100% export oriented undertaking depended on their actual nature, because the duty and exemption consequences differed if the goods were cotton waste or cotton carded/combed. The adjudication order did not address that factual character, which was central to the dispute. The Tribunal therefore held that the matter required fresh examination by the jurisdictional Commissioner, with an opportunity of hearing to the appellants and a reasoned order on the true nature of the goods. The matter was remanded for reconsideration of classification, duty, and penalty issues after ascertaining the factual position.

---

---

Issues: Whether the dispute regarding classification of the goods and the resultant duty liability required remand for ascertainment of the actual nature of the goods cleared from the 100% export oriented undertaking.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the rival classifications turned on whether the goods were cotton waste or cotton carded/combed and that the tariff and exemption consequences differed under the Central Excise and Customs regime applicable to 100% EOUs. It also observed that, despite substantial quantities and clearances, there was no discussion in the adjudication order on the actual nature of the goods cleared. As the factual character of the goods was central to the classification dispute, the matter required further examination by the jurisdictional Commissioner after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing and then passing a reasoned order.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after ascertaining the actual nature of the goods in dispute, with consequential reconsideration of classification, duty, and penalty issues.

---