Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. when supplied for a World Bank-assisted project, and whether denial of the benefit could rest on alleged non-production of a prescribed certificate or on grounds not raised in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The notification exempted specified goods supplied to projects financed by the United Nations or an international organisation and approved by the Government of India, subject to production before clearance of a certificate from such organisation. The record showed that the goods were supplied for a World Bank-financed project, that the World Bank had issued letters confirming the award of contracts and eligibility of the ex-factory cost for disbursement, and that no prescribed form of certificate was laid down in the notification. The denial of exemption on a basis beyond the show cause notice was not permissible. The expression "financed by" was held to cover a project supported by loan or credit from the international organisation, not only one where the entire cost was directly borne by it.
Conclusion: The goods satisfied the notification conditions and the exemption was admissible; the demand and penalty could not stand.