Pan chutney classification dispute turns on common parlance, trade identity, and whether it resembles sauce or ketchup.

Classification of pan chutney turned on whether, in common parlance and trade understanding, it is a preparation akin to sauce or ketchup or merely an edible preparation not elsewhere specified. The majority viewed it as a relish used only to add taste or flavour to pan and therefore within Tariff Heading 2103.11, while declining to follow the earlier contrary Tribunal view. The dissent treated the product as an edible preparation outside Heading 2103.11 and supported classification under Heading 2107.91 by following the earlier ruling.

---

---

Issues: Whether 'pan chutney' is classifiable under Tariff Heading 2103.11 as a preparation akin to sauce or ketchup, or under Tariff Heading 2107.91 as an edible preparation not elsewhere specified or included.

Analysis: The competing tariff entries were examined in the light of the product's composition, use, and commercial identity. The majority found that 'pan chutney' is not taken as food and is used only to add relish, taste, or flavour to pan. Applying common parlance and the understanding of the trade and consumers, the majority held that the product functions in the same manner as sauce or ketchup in relation to pan and therefore answers the description of preparations of the kind covered by Heading 2103.11 rather than an edible preparation under Heading 2107.91. The earlier contrary view in another Tribunal decision was considered, but the majority declined to follow it and preferred to place the matter before a Larger Bench. The dissent held that the product is an edible preparation not falling under Heading 2103.11 and followed the earlier Tribunal view classifying it under Heading 2107.91.

Conclusion: The product is more appropriately classifiable under Tariff Heading 2107, and the appeal stands rejected.

Dissenting Opinion: The dissenting Member held that 'pan chutney' does not satisfy the description of preparations akin to sauce or ketchup under Heading 2103.11, treated the earlier Tribunal ruling as binding, and concluded that the product falls under Heading 2107.91, warranting rejection of the appeal on that basis.

---