Captive consumption exclusion under exemption notification and reversal of Modvat credit on embedded inputs where credit bar applies.

Explanation VI to Notification No. 1/93 applied to captively consumed Narrow Woven Fabrics used within the factory to manufacture Zip fasteners or Slide fasteners, so their value had to be excluded from aggregate clearances for exemption eligibility. The assessee therefore remained within the exemption limit. However, Modvat credit taken on duty-paid inputs embedded in those captively consumed goods could not be retained where Rule 57-C barred such credit, so the attributable credit had to be reversed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Narrow Woven Fabrics captively consumed in the manufacture of Zip fasteners or Slide fasteners were to be excluded while computing the aggregate value of clearances for the exemption under Notification No. 1/93; (ii) Whether, despite setting aside the duty demand and penalty, the duty element on inputs contained in the captively consumed goods had to be reversed because of the bar under Rule 57-C.

Issue (i): Whether Narrow Woven Fabrics captively consumed in the manufacture of Zip fasteners or Slide fasteners were to be excluded while computing the aggregate value of clearances for the exemption under Notification No. 1/93.

Analysis: Explanation VI to Notification No. 1/93 was applicable where both the inputs and the final product were specified goods under the notification and the inputs were used within the factory for further manufacture. Since the Narrow Woven Fabrics were used for manufacturing Zip fasteners or Slide fasteners, the value of such captively consumed clearances was required to be excluded from the aggregate turnover for determining eligibility to the exemption limit.

Conclusion: The captively consumed clearances were entitled to exclusion, and the assessee remained within the exemption limit.

Issue (ii): Whether, despite setting aside the duty demand and penalty, the duty element on inputs contained in the captively consumed goods had to be reversed because of the bar under Rule 57-C.

Analysis: The assessee had taken Modvat credit on duty-paid Polyester Monofilament Yarn and Polyester Filament Yarn. To the extent such duty-paid inputs went into the captively consumed goods used for further manufacture, the credit could not be retained where Rule 57-C applied.

Conclusion: The duty credit attributable to the inputs contained in the captively consumed goods was required to be reversed.

Final Conclusion: The duty demand and penalty were set aside, but the Modvat credit attributable to the relevant inputs had to be reversed in accordance with the applicable excise rule.

Ratio Decidendi: Where exemption notification provisions expressly permit exclusion of captively consumed specified goods used for further manufacture, such clearances are not counted for the exemption threshold; however, credit taken on duty-paid inputs embedded in such goods must still be reversed where the credit bar applies.

---