Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants made out a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the disputed Modvat credit taken on invoices and testing equipment claimed as capital goods.
Analysis: The invoices were examined against the show-cause notice and were found, prima facie, capable of being accepted as valid duty-paying documents, with any defect appearing to be only rectifiable. There was also no dispute as to receipt of the goods, their use in the factory, and the duty-paying character of the transactions. On the question of testing equipment, reliance was placed on an earlier Tribunal order in the applicants' own case holding testing machines to be capital goods for Modvat purposes, and that view was followed for the present interim relief.
Conclusion: The applicants established a strong prima facie case and were entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during the pendency of the appeal.