Import policy licence requirements for components and negative-list goods, plus limits on separate partner penalties.

Under the 1992-97 Export and Import Policy, consumer goods could be imported only against a licence or under a public notice, and Public Notice No. 32/92 allowed accessories, component parts and spares of consumer durables only if they were not on the negative list. On that basis, PCB sub-assemblies imported as components of quartz clock movement were treated as licensable goods and remained liable to confiscation and redemption fine where no licence or applicable exemption was shown. The commentary also notes that a separate personal penalty on a partner was not justified when the firm had already been penalised on the same facts without an independent basis for additional liability.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether PCB imported as sub-assemblies/components of quartz clock movement were liable to confiscation under the import policy for want of a specific import licence. (ii) Whether the separate personal penalty imposed on the partner was justified when a like penalty had already been imposed on the importer firm.

Issue (i): Whether PCB imported as sub-assemblies/components of quartz clock movement were liable to confiscation under the import policy for want of a specific import licence.

Analysis: Paragraph 156 of the Export and Import Policy 1992-97 permits import of consumer goods only against a licence or under a public notice. Public Notice No. 32/92 clarified that accessories, component parts and spares of consumer durables may be imported without licence only if they are not specifically included in the negative list. The imported PCBs were treated as sub-assemblies/components of consumer durables, and the record did not show that they fell outside the scope of the negative list or that the licence requirement stood dispensed with.

Conclusion: The confiscation of the goods and the redemption fine were upheld, and this issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the separate personal penalty imposed on the partner was justified when a like penalty had already been imposed on the importer firm.

Analysis: The same penal consequence had already been imposed on the firm, and no separate case was made out for an additional penalty on the partner on the facts found.

Conclusion: The personal penalty on the partner was set aside, and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The order was sustained as to confiscation and redemption fine, but the personal penalty on the partner was deleted, resulting in a partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods falling within the negative list under the import policy remain liable to confiscation when imported without the required licence, even if imported as components or sub-assemblies; a separate penalty on an individual is not warranted absent an independent basis distinct from the penalty already imposed on the firm.

---