Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were consumer goods covered by the Import-Export Policy, 1992-97 and therefore required a specific import licence, or whether they were industrial chemicals not so covered.
Analysis: The goods were found to be in ready-to-use condition, packed in small consumer packing, and sold in the same form as imported without further processing or repacking. The policy definition of consumer goods includes goods that directly satisfy human needs without further processing, and the Tribunal held that the expression was wide enough to cover goods meant for repair purposes even where the consumer may be an industrial user. On the admitted facts, the nature of packing and use supported the classification made by the customs authorities.
Conclusion: The imported goods were consumer goods under the policy and their import required a specific licence. The appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods that are imported in ready-to-use form, sold in the same condition, and capable of direct use without further processing may be classified as consumer goods under the import policy, even if they are used by industrial consumers for repair purposes.