Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the items in question were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the availability of Modvat credit on various plant, machinery, electrical and allied items claimed as capital goods. The Tribunal applied its earlier decision on the scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q and held that the items covered by the impugned order fell within that entitlement. The absence of a direct manufacturing role did not dislodge the credit once the governing rule, as interpreted by the Tribunal, supported inclusion of such goods.
Conclusion: The items were held to qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q, and the Revenue's challenge failed.