Classification of card cans and silver cans turned on constituent material, not textile machinery parts, defeating exemption.

Card cans and silver cans made of plastic or aluminium were held not to be parts or accessories of textile machinery under sub-heading 8448.00. The analysis noted that the spinning machine could function independently without them, and that the cans merely held and released silver or roving without participating in the machine's mechanical operation. Their classification therefore depended on their constituent material, so they fell under the respective tariff headings for plastic or aluminium articles. As they were not machinery parts or accessories, exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was unavailable.

---

---

Issues: Whether card cans and silver cans manufactured of plastic or aluminium were classifiable as parts or accessories of textile machinery under sub-heading 8448.00, and consequently eligible for exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. dated 1-3-1986, or were classifiable according to their constituent material under the relevant tariff headings.

Analysis: The products were placed alongside the machinery but did not form part of the spinning machine and the machine could function independently without them. They were receptacles used for holding and releasing silver or roving and did not participate in the mechanical functioning of the machinery. Their character depended on the material of manufacture, namely plastic or aluminium, and the tariff approach supported classification according to constituent material rather than as machinery parts or accessories. The cited Tribunal view in Unipol Plastic Industries also supported that card cans did not satisfy the criteria of machinery parts.

Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable as parts or accessories of textile machinery under sub-heading 8448.00 and were correctly classifiable as articles of plastic or aluminium under the respective tariff headings. The claim to exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. consequently failed. The appeals were rejected.

---