Conditional pre-deposit relief in Modvat credit dispute: full waiver refused, partial stay granted pending appeal.

In a stay application concerning disputed Modvat credit on capital goods and inputs, including claims under Rule 57Q and an alternative claim under Rule 57A, the tribunal found that the material did not establish a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. It also considered the Revenue's objection over shortage in transit, but granted only conditional relief in the circumstances. Full waiver was refused; the applicants were required to deposit 50% of the duty within eight weeks, and upon compliance the balance duty and penalty were stayed during pendency of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in relation to the disputed Modvat credit.

Analysis: The dispute concerned Modvat credit claimed on capital goods and inputs, including items said to fall under Rule 57Q and an alternative claim under Rule 57A. The Court also noted the Revenue's objection regarding shortage in transit and the contention that such loss could not justify full relief. On the material before it, the Court was not satisfied that a strong prima facie case for complete waiver had been made out, but considered the overall circumstances and the cited precedent sufficient to justify conditional relief.

Conclusion: Full waiver was refused. The applicants were directed to deposit 50% of the duty amount within eight weeks, and on compliance the remaining duty and the penalty were stayed during pendency of the appeal.

Final Conclusion: The stay application was only partly allowed by granting conditional waiver of pre-deposit and interim protection, while leaving the appeal pending for final adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: In a stay matter, where complete waiver is not warranted on the prima facie material, conditional relief may be granted by requiring partial pre-deposit and staying recovery of the balance during the appeal.

---