Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit as capital goods was admissible on the disputed items, namely surge arrestors, MS angles/columns/girders, workshop equipment, and stationary battery.
Analysis: Items used in the factory and falling within the specified description in Rule 57Q(1) were treated as capital goods. Surge arrestors were held eligible because they functioned as components of the transformer and were used in the factory. MS angles, columns and girders were denied credit because they were used as fabrication or construction material in the casing and walls of the cement mill. Workshop equipment used only for repair and maintenance was held not to qualify as capital goods since it was not used for producing or processing the final product. The stationary battery installed in the captive power plant was held eligible because it was used for generation of power directly connected with manufacture of cement.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible only on surge arrestors and stationary battery, and inadmissible on MS angles, columns, girders, and the workshop equipment.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in the factory qualify as capital goods only when they fall within the statutory definition and have a direct functional nexus with the manufacture or processing of the final product.