Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coil cords manufactured for use between the receiver and the main telephone apparatus were classifiable under Heading 85.17 as telephone cords, or under Heading 85.44 of the Central Excise Tariff Act.
Analysis: The dispute on classification was covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's own case, which had held that coil cords used between the receiver and the main telephone apparatus fall under Heading 85.17. Following that binding classification view, the contrary classification adopted in the impugned order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The coil cords were held classifiable under Heading 85.17, and not under Heading 85.44, of the Central Excise Tariff Act.