Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the facts of the stay applications, the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duty and penalties demanded.
Analysis: The register produced by the appellant indicated production and recycling of broken biscuits, and the show cause notice had proceeded on the assumption that the register was a proven document. On that basis, the allegation of clandestine clearance of broken biscuits was not supported at the interim stage. At the same time, the record showed that broken biscuits were known to be excisable, and the claim of ignorance regarding sugar syrup did not carry much force. The Tribunal also noted that the quantum of penalty appeared disproportionate to the alleged offence.
Conclusion: A strong prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit of the duty and for stay of its recovery, while partial pre-deposit of the penalty was directed and the balance recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeals.
Final Conclusion: The stay applications were disposed of by granting interim protection in part, with limited pre-deposit ordered only against the appellant company and complete waiver of pre-deposit for the connected penalty appeals.