Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to dispense with the pre-deposit condition in respect of the duty and penalty imposed on solar cookers with electrical back-up, in view of the exemption notification and the arguable nature of the dispute.
Analysis: Solar cookers were exempted under the notification, while solar cookers with electrical back-up were treated as outside its scope. The question whether such cookers were still covered by the exemption was found to be an arguable point. In these circumstances, and having regard to the appellant being a Government-owned small scale undertaking, insistence on pre-deposit was considered unnecessary for entertaining the appeal.
Conclusion: The appellant was granted dispensation from pre-deposit, and the stay petition was allowed.