Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order fixing the annual production capacity of the rolling mill, based on declared parameters under the relevant notification, was sustainable when the assessee was not given an opportunity to explain the changes in the parameters.
Analysis: The adjudicating authority relied upon changes in parameters such as the gear-box ratio and the meaning attributed to the parameter 'd' in the formula under the notification. The assessees were not put on notice or afforded an opportunity to explain the variation in the declared parameters before an adverse conclusion was reached. In these circumstances, the order was held to suffer from breach of the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal also noted that the change in the meaning of the parameters explained the apparent variation in the figures relied upon by the authority.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication de novo.
Final Conclusion: The appellant obtained relief by way of setting aside of the order and remand for reconsideration in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudicatory order founded on changed technical parameters cannot be sustained unless the assessee is given a fair opportunity to explain the variation; failure to do so vitiates the order for breach of natural justice.