Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund application under Section 27 of the Customs Act was filed within the prescribed limitation period and, if so, whether the rejection on the ground of limitation could stand.
Analysis: The limitation under Section 27 runs from the date of payment of duty, and the date of payment is liable to be excluded while computing the six-month period. On that computation, the refund claim filed on 19-7-1996 was within time. The rejection based on the view that the application had to be filed before the expiry of six months, and not on the last day, was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held to be within limitation and the matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh decision on merits after granting an opportunity of hearing.