Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a combined fax machine and telephone answering machine was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 59/88-Cus.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the separate components, namely the fax machine and the telephone answering machine, were each admitted by the Revenue to be entitled to the notification benefit. It further held that there was no basis to deny the same benefit merely because the two facilities were combined in a single article, since the authorities cited by the Revenue did not apply to the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The combined article was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 59/88-Cus., and the Revenue's appeal failed.