Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether spares for a hoist were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The hoist was treated as material handling equipment, and the Tribunal relied on its earlier decisions holding that material handling equipment such as cranes, forklifts, conveyor belts and hoists can fall within the scope of capital goods for the purpose of Rule 57Q. Following the ratio of the earlier decision on similar lifting and handling machinery, the credit claim for spares used in connection with the hoist was considered covered by the established view that such equipment has the requisite nexus with manufacture for the purposes of Modvat credit.
Conclusion: The spares for the hoist were held eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods, and the Revenue appeal failed.