Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 for the period 1-4-1992 to 21-5-1992 after its amendment by Notification No. 55/92.
Analysis: Notification No. 55/92 substituted the second proviso to paragraph 4 of Notification No. 175/86 and withdrew the benefit of clause (b) where the manufacturer had availed exemption under clause (a) in any preceding financial year. The respondents had exceeded the specified clearance limit in the preceding year and were not registered as a small scale unit, and those facts were not controverted. On that basis, the amended notification barred the respondents from claiming the exemption during the relevant period.
Conclusion: The respondents were not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 as amended, and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.