Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted in a dispute concerning classification and exemption benefit for turbine parts cleared from the factory and bought-out items sent directly to site.
Analysis: The arguable question was whether clearance of a few parts from the factory, together with direct dispatch of bought-out items to the customer's site, amounted to clearance of a turbine in CKD condition for the purpose of exemption. The Tribunal noted that this issue could be examined only at the stage of the main appeal. It further found that the appellants had not established a prima facie case for complete waiver of duty and penalty, though a prima facie case was made out on limitation. On financial hardship, the material on record did not justify full dispensation from pre-deposit, but supported partial relief.
Conclusion: Complete waiver was declined, but partial waiver of pre-deposit was granted on deposit of Rs. 50 lakhs, with stay of recovery of the balance during pendency of the appeals.