Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether power cable and hoist were capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The entitlement to Modvat credit turned on whether the disputed items qualified as capital goods. The issue stood covered by the Tribunal's Larger Bench ruling relied upon in the order, which treated power cable as capital goods for the purpose of Rule 57Q. The hoist, being a material-handling equipment, was also treated as falling within the scope of capital goods under the same rule.
Conclusion: Both power cable and hoist were held to be capital goods under Rule 57Q, and credit of duty paid thereon was admissible to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Items falling within the scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q are eligible for Modvat credit, including equipment used in material handling where covered by the governing precedent.