Customs valuation of imported goods: transaction value may be rejected, but comparable imports must follow the statutory hierarchy of benchmark prices.

Customs valuation of imported tung oil turned on whether the declared transaction value could be rejected in favour of contemporaneous import prices. The declared value was rejected because comparable imports showed higher prices, but the comparison had to follow the statutory hierarchy of identical goods, then similar goods, and the proper rule-based selection of the benchmark value. The common supplier alone was insufficient to justify adoption of one higher price. The assessable value was therefore reduced to the lower comparable value, with corresponding reduction of redemption fine, while the penalty was maintained.

---

---

Issues: Valuation of the imported tung oil under customs law, including whether the declared transaction value could be rejected in favour of contemporaneous import prices and the consequential effect on confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty.

Analysis: The declared value was not accepted because the record showed contemporaneous imports of comparable tung oil at higher prices, and the Collector was justified in rejecting the transaction value under the customs valuation framework. However, where reliance is placed on comparable imports, the comparison must be made with the proper rule-based benchmark of identical goods, failing which similar goods, and the mere fact that the same supplier was common to two buyers was not enough to justify adoption of one particular higher import price. On the materials available, the lower of the contemporaneous values was required to be applied under the valuation rule governing such comparisons.

Conclusion: The declared value was rejected, but the assessable value was reduced to the lower comparable value, with corresponding reduction of redemption fine and no interference with the penalty.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of reassessment on a lower customs value and reduction of fine, while the confiscatory and penal consequences were otherwise maintained.

Ratio Decidendi: In customs valuation, transaction value may be rejected where contemporaneous imports of identical or similar goods show a materially higher comparable price, and the comparison must follow the statutory hierarchy of identical goods, similar goods, and the proper rule-based selection of the comparable value.

---