Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether articles of unhardened vulcanised rubber were classifiable under Heading 86.07 or under Chapter Heading 4016.19 of the Central Excise Tariff Act.
Analysis: The classification dispute turned on the nature of the goods manufactured by the appellant. The Tribunal noted that an earlier decision concerning similar goods had already held that vulcanised rubber products other than hardened rubber fell under Chapter Heading 4016.19. In view of that prior determination and the material similarity of the goods, the contrary classification adopted in the impugned order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 4016.19 of the Central Excise Tariff Act and not under Heading 86.07, and the assessee succeeded.