Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pre-deposit condition of the penalty amount could be dispensed with pending appeal.
Analysis: The applicants had made declarations under Rule 57F(17)(b) and reversed Modvat credit in respect of goods shown as semi-finished, and the record indicated that the disputed goods had been reflected in those declarations. The Tribunal found a prima facie case that the goods ought to have been entered in the final RG 1 records, and also noted that the applicants' reference had been registered before the BIFR, attracting the protection recognised in the governing law regarding suspension of legal proceedings against an industrial unit after registration of reference.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit condition was dispensed with and the stay petition was allowed unconditionally in favour of the assessee.