TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Confirms Goods Confiscation & Dismisses Appeal on Fine Reduction</h1> <h3>MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., AURANGABAD</h3> The Tribunal upheld the Collector's decision to confiscate the goods under 173Q(1)(b) and dismissed the appellant's appeal against the reduction of fine ... Redemption fine and penalty - Quantum of The appeal was against the reduction of fine and penalty by the Collector (Appeals). The appellant argued against confiscation of goods, citing lack of evidence for evasion. The Collector found goods liable for confiscation under 173Q(1)(b). Tribunal held that the reduction in fine was sufficient, dismissing the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
