Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 225/86-C.E. could be denied on the ground that the set-off of duty on inputs had to be matched one-to-one with the final products manufactured from those inputs.
Analysis: Notification No. 225/86-C.E., as amended by Notification No. 329/86-C.E., grants exemption from duty on paper and paper board to the extent of the excise duty paid on specified inputs used in or in relation to manufacture. The controlling principle is that the benefit is available as an abatement on the duty payable on the final products, and it is not necessary at every stage of clearance to establish a strict co-relation between a particular lot of inputs and the corresponding final goods. At the same time, the inputs must in fact be used in or in relation to the manufacture of the notified final goods, and the quantum of exemption is confined to the duty paid on such used inputs.
Conclusion: The one-to-one co-relation objection was rejected, and the matter was remanded to verify whether the inputs were used in or in relation to the manufacture of the notified final products and to extend the notification benefit if that requirement is satisfied.