Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit. (ii) Whether financial hardship justified waiver of the pre-deposit condition.
Issue (i): The order examined whether the demand could prima facie be sustained on the basis of relationship and alleged suppression. In the absence of evidence establishing relationship under the relevant excise provision and in the absence of satisfactory material showing depression of prices by comparison with comparable goods, the demand on the higher price basis did not appear immediately sustainable at the interim stage.
Conclusion: A prima facie case was found in favour of the appellant for waiver consideration.
Issue (ii): The order considered the pleaded losses, closure of the factory, resignation of directors, retrenchment of staff, and the overall financial condition of the appellant. On those facts, the requirement of immediate pre-deposit was regarded as causing hardship.
Conclusion: Financial hardship was accepted and supported waiver of pre-deposit.
Final Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived, subject to an undertaking not to transfer or alienate the plant and machinery until disposal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Pre-deposit may be waived where the appellant shows a prima facie arguable case on merits and financial hardship justifying interim relief.