Specific tariff heading controls classification of powerloom parts over general machinery-parts heading.

Powerloom parts such as shafts, flywheels and pulleys were held classifiable under the specific tariff heading for those goods, not under the general heading for parts of machinery. Applying Section Note 2(a) of Section XVI, the text explains that goods specifically covered by a heading in Chapters 84 or 85 must be classified in that heading, and only goods not so covered may be taken with the machine of principal use. On that basis, the classification under Heading 84.83 prevailed over Heading 84.48.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disputed powerloom parts were classifiable under Heading 84.83 of the Central Excise Tariff or under Heading 84.48 as parts of machinery.

Analysis: The disputed items, including shafts, flywheels, pulleys and related parts, were found to be specifically described under Heading 84.83. Under Section Note 2(a) of Section XVI, goods included in a specific heading in Chapters 84 or 85 must be classified in that heading, and only goods not so specifically covered are eligible for classification with the machine of principal use. Since the items fell within the specific tariff description, the general heading claimed by the appellants could not apply.

Conclusion: The disputed goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 84.83 and not under Heading 84.48.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower authority was upheld, and the appeals failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are specifically described in a tariff heading, they must be classified under that specific heading and cannot be treated as parts of a machine under a general or residuary heading.

---