Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sandwich paper manufactured by the respondents was excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 49/87 dated 1-3-1987 as a product consisting of sheets of paper or paper board impregnated, coated or covered with plastics compressed together in one or more operations.
Analysis: The lower authorities had found that the product was neither impregnated, nor coated, nor covered with plastics. The evidence showed that two layers of paper were merely stuck together by using LDPE plastic as an adhesive. The expression "impregnated" requires the medium to saturate or fill the interstices of the paper, which was not the case here. The molten LDPE was used only to bind the two layers together and did not bring the product within the excluded category in the notification.
Conclusion: The product did not fall within the exclusion in Notification No. 49/87 and remained eligible for the exemption; the Revenue's appeal was rejected.