Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was available to sand-mix used in the manufacture of sand-moulds, where the sand-moulds were themselves captively used in the manufacture of steel castings.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether sand-mix, though first used to make sand-moulds, could be treated as having been used in the manufacture of the final product, namely steel castings, when the moulds were an intermediate product in the same manufacturing chain. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in TELCO and the Larger Bench view that such sand-mix is covered by the exemption where the moulds are ultimately used in the manufacture of duty-paid castings. The contrary view treating the input as used only in moulds was not accepted.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was held applicable to the sand-mix used for making sand-moulds employed in the manufacture of steel castings, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and both appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: An input used in making an intermediate product is treated as used in the manufacture of the final product for exemption purposes where the intermediate product is itself used captively in the manufacture of duty-paid final goods.