1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Partnership Deed Date Discrepancy Resolved: Assessee's Genuineness Upheld</h1> The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee, a partnership firm, in a case involving a date discrepancy in a partnership deed. The court ... Tribunal holding that the date given in the partnership deed was an error and that the firm was genuine - It cannot be said that the Tribunal's finding were without any material or they were perverse - It is not possible to say that the Tribunal relied upon irrelevant considerations - so, this finding of fact could not be challenged in a reference β no reference lies to High Court against such a decision The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee, a partnership firm, in a case involving the date discrepancy in a partnership deed. The court held that the Tribunal's findings were based on sufficient evidence, concluding that the firm was genuine and entitled to registration. The court awarded costs of Rs. 200 to the assessee.