Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the duty demand should be waived and recovery stayed on the basis of the prima facie applicability of the exemption notification and the Tribunal's earlier view on captive consumption of PVC sheets in the manufacture of PVC leather cloth.
Analysis: The demand was founded on the allegation that the appellant ought to have availed exemption under Notification No. 217/86 for PVC sheets used captively in the manufacture of PVC leather cloth. The Tribunal found that the appellant's contention was supported by earlier Tribunal decisions on the same point. It further noted that the show cause notice did not clearly raise any demand on the separate basis that Modvat credit was restricted by law on the inputs in question, and the Commissioner's order did not address that aspect. On that prima facie view, the demand required no immediate pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the duty demand was stayed.