Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polyester/polypropylene plastic film scrap was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 14/92-C.E. dated 1-3-1992 when it arose during manufacture from duty-paid plastic granules.
Analysis: The notification granted nil rate of duty to waste, pairing and scrap of plastic arising from goods falling under Chapter 39 or any other Chapter of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 on which duty of excise or additional customs duty had already been paid. The Revenue did not dispute that the inputs used for manufacture were duty-paid plastic granules. The mere fact that a distinct final product emerged without duty payment did not defeat the notification, because the relevant condition was that the waste and scrap should arise from duty-paid goods. The waste and scrap arose in the course of manufacture of the final product, and the statutory condition stood satisfied.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 14/92-C.E. dated 1-3-1992 was available to the assessee, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where waste and scrap of plastic arise during manufacture from duty-paid inputs falling under Chapter 39, exemption cannot be denied merely because the finished product itself was not duty-paid.