Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay of recovery pending appeal, having regard to the prima facie merits of the valuation dispute and the plea of limitation.
Analysis: The dispute involved valuation of soaps manufactured as a job worker, where the assessable value was computed on cost of manufacture and profit without including duty paid on inputs on which Modvat credit had been taken. The Tribunal noted that the cited precedent on valuation was prima facie favourable to the applicant. On limitation, it found a strong prima facie case because the notice did not set out the factual basis necessary for invoking the extended period, the department had knowledge of the method of valuation through the Chartered Accountant's certificate and the notice itself, and no prima facie suppression or misstatement was shown.
Conclusion: Waiver of deposit and stay of recovery were granted in favour of the applicant.