Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules could be availed simultaneously with clearance of goods at nil rate of duty under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., where one category of detergent cake bore the assessee's own brand name and another category bore the brand name of another person.
Analysis: The assessee manufactured two different categories of detergent cake. The goods bearing its own brand name were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., while the goods bearing the brand name of another person fell outside the notification by virtue of para 4. Since the exemption and the Modvat credit related to different categories of goods, the simultaneous availment was not hit by the prohibition relied upon by the department. The principle followed was that small-scale exemption and Modvat credit may coexist where they are claimed in respect of different goods.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to avail Modvat credit while clearing the eligible goods at nil rate of duty, and the demand was unsustainable.