Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the duty liability on wires and bars of non-alloy steel falling under sub-heading 7217.90 for the period 14-5-1992 to 25-6-1992 was required to be restricted in terms of the notification issued under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The goods in question were covered by the later notification issued under Section 11C and Notification No. 21/96-C.E. (N.T.), dated 5-8-1996, which exempted the excess duty beyond the duty on Rs. 1,000 per M.T. for the relevant period. The factual position was accepted by the Revenue, and the dispute did not survive on merits.
Conclusion: The duty demand could not be sustained, and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.