Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether forging test pieces received along with forgings and used for testing during manufacture qualify as inputs used in relation to manufacture for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The forging test pieces were received with the forgings and underwent machining and heat treatment alongside them. Their function was to verify whether the forgings met the required specifications at each stage of processing, and only on acceptance of the test results were the components sent for further manufacture. On these facts, the test pieces were not merely parallel items but served an essential role in in-process testing connected with manufacture. The expression used in relation to manufacture was applied in its wide sense, extending to goods used in activities pertaining to the manufacture even if they do not enter the finished product.
Conclusion: The forging test pieces were covered by the expression used in relation to the manufacture and were eligible for Modvat credit. The disallowance was unsustainable.