Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for dispensing with pre-deposit in respect of Modvat credit denied on invoices standing in the name of the loan licencee.
Analysis: The denial of credit was based on the invoices being in the name of the loan licencee, though the goods were manufactured in the appellant's factory for that loan licencee under Notification No. 27/92-C.E. The Tribunal noted that, on identical facts, it had already held that such invoices could be accepted as documents for Modvat purposes under Rule 57G when the notification itself contemplated manufacture for the loan licencee. Since the major part of the demand was covered by that precedent, a prima facie case for interim relief was made out.
Conclusion: The application for dispensing with pre-deposit was allowed and stay was granted in favour of the appellant.