Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported haemometer was classifiable under Heading 90.27 as an instrument and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis, or under Chapter 70 / Heading 70.17 as laboratory glassware.
Analysis: The imported goods were found, on the product literature and description of the set, to constitute a complete instrument comprising comparator tubes, pipettes, support and related parts, and not merely glassware. Chapter 70 covers glass and glassware, while its note excludes articles of Chapter 90. The goods were specialised appliances for a specific medical purpose and not articles of general laboratory use. The explanatory notes to Heading 90.18 also supported the view that blood-testing instruments used in laboratories are classifiable under Heading 90.27.
Conclusion: The haemometer was correctly classifiable under Heading 90.27 of the Customs Tariff and not under Chapter 70 / Heading 70.17. The appeal of the Revenue failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A specialised medical testing set constituting a complete instrument, and not an article of general laboratory glassware, is classifiable under the heading for instruments and apparatus for analysis rather than under the heading for glassware.