Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported test stand was classifiable under Tariff Heading 90.28(4) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, or under Tariff Heading 90.16 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and whether the matter required remand for consideration of new technical evidence.
Analysis: Tariff Heading 90.28 was construed as covering instruments and apparatus used for measuring, checking, analysing or controlling electrical quantities or electrical phenomena, and not merely apparatus that is electrically operated. The write-up filed before the lower authorities was treated as correlatable to the imported model because the model number matched the invoice and that material had not been disputed below. However, the technical literature newly produced was not before the lower authorities and constituted fresh evidence relevant to deciding the proper classification. In these circumstances, the classification issue could not be finally concluded on the existing record.
Conclusion: The heading 90.28(4) classification contention was not finally accepted or rejected, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.
Final Conclusion: The order settled the scope of Tariff Heading 90.28(4) for the purpose of re-examination, but the ultimate classification was left open for fresh decision by the lower authority.