Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported Chrome Nickel Steel Tubes (Incoloy-800) were classifiable as "stainless steel" under Item No. 73.15(2) of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or as goods not elsewhere specified under Heading 73.17/19(1).
Analysis: The dispute turned on the correct tariff description of the imported goods. The Tribunal found the issue identical to an earlier decision concerning Incoloy-800 tubes and followed that view. On that basis, it held that the imported goods were not stainless steel for the purpose of Item No. 73.15(2) and were instead assessable under the residuary heading applicable to goods not elsewhere specified.
Conclusion: The imported goods were not classifiable as stainless steel under Item No. 73.15(2) and were assessable under Heading 73.17/19(1), with duty leviable accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported Incoloy-800 tubes are not commercially and tariff-wise understood as stainless steel, they cannot be classified under the stainless steel entry and must fall under the residuary tariff heading for goods not elsewhere specified.