TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal excludes blister packing cost from assessable value of cameras.</h1> <h3>PHOTOPHONE INDUS. (I) LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GOA</h3> The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside as the Tribunal held that the cost of blister packing should not be included in the ... Valuation The appeal was against including the cost of blister packing in the assessable value of cameras. The appellant argued that packing the camera in its case does not amount to manufacture. The Tribunal held that the cost of packing should not be included in the assessable value. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
