Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether diamond impregnated segments fitted to saw blades were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 207/88-C.E. dated 1-6-1988.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision holding that diamond impregnated segments used in saw blades were covered by the notification. That view had already been affirmed in effect by the Supreme Court's dismissal of the Revenue's civil appeal against the earlier Tribunal decision. In these circumstances, the impugned order granting the benefit of the notification required no interference.
Conclusion: The exemption was held admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.