Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, pending disposal of the appeals, duty liability under Section 3A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was to be worked out on actual production or on the basis of capacity determined under the relevant annual capacity rules.
Analysis: The issue was treated as already covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision on the same question. For one set of applicants, the stay petitions were therefore allowed unconditionally. For the other applicant, the Tribunal accepted the submission that the capacity determination was alleged to be excessive and directed that collection should not exceed the duty liability arising under Section 3A(4) until the appeals were decided.
Outcome: Interim relief was granted in favour of the applicants, and the Revenue was restrained from collecting duty beyond the liability attributable under Section 3A(4) pending the appeals.