TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Victory for Vehicle Manufacturers: Refund Claims Upheld in Tax Dispute</h1> The appellants, manufacturers of Jeeps and light commercial vehicles, challenged the rejection of their refund claims for certain vehicles under ... Refund - Unjust enrichment Issues:Classification of light commercial motor vehicles under Notification 463/86 for duty exemption; rejection of refund claims by Assistant Collector; challenge through Writ Petition; clarification by Central Board of Excise & Customs; rejection of refund claim on grounds of unjust enrichment; valuation issue pending before Bombay High Court.Classification of Light Commercial Motor Vehicles under Notification 463/86:The appellants, manufacturers of Jeeps and light commercial vehicles, filed a classification list for their goods under Notification 463/86, claiming duty exemption for light commercial motor vehicles with specific criteria. The Assistant Collector approved the classification list, extending the benefit of the Notification. However, a show cause notice was issued proposing rejection of refund claims for certain vehicles, leading to a challenge through a Writ Petition. The Central Board of Excise & Customs later clarified that the benefit was available to all light commercial vehicles, including chassis. The Revenue withdrew its appeal, and the appellants' appeal against the rejection of refund claims was allowed, remanding the issue for reconsideration.Rejection of Refund Claims and Unjust Enrichment:Following the Board's clarification, the Assistant Collector directed the appellants to file a fresh refund claim, which was rejected on the grounds of unjust enrichment. This rejection led to another Writ Petition, which was allowed by the Bombay High Court. The Collector (Appeals) set aside the reasons for rejection but did not sanction the refund due to a pending valuation issue before the High Court.Valuation Issue and Final Decision:The High Court, in a separate judgment, decided the valuation issue in favor of the appellants, holding the Department's interpretation on valuation as unjustified and contrary to law. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the finalization of provisional assessments based on the High Court's order and granted the consequential refund accordingly, disposing of the appeal in favor of the appellants.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
