Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to concessional duty under Notification No. 175/86 when the loan licensee had crossed the clearance limit and thereby become ineligible for the exemption.
Analysis: The claim to exemption depended on the eligibility of the unit for the small scale industry concession and on the correct computation of the aggregate value of clearances. The factual position accepted by the Tribunal was that the loan licensee had crossed the prescribed clearance limit before the relevant classification list was filed and had started paying duty at the normal rate. In that situation, the clearances made on behalf of such ineligible unit could not be treated as entitled to the concessional rate under the notification.
Conclusion: The respondents were not entitled to concessional duty under Notification No. 175/86, and the demand confirmed by the Assistant Collector was restored.