1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal dismissed due to limitation period, incorrect credit rule applied.</h1> The appeal filed by the department was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai. The demand made by the Assistant Collector was deemed barred by ... Demand - Limitation The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai heard an appeal filed by the department against a decision where the demand made by the Assistant Collector was held to be barred by limitation. The respondents applied for transfer of credit under Rule 57H(3) but the appellate authority found that the credit was wrongly taken under Rule 56A instead of Rule 57A. The appeal was dismissed based on the judgment of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal regarding the time limit for issuing show cause notices.